Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey debated Twitter's algorithm, and Musk was actually right

Share This Post

Elon Musk twitter account

We’ve entered uncharted territory, folks. Elon Musk tweeted something that’s actually basically correct for once.

Musk, who may or may not buy Twitter soon (“may not” is currently in the lead), did what he always does on Saturday and posted some musings to his Twitter feed. Among them was a call for Twitter users to change their feeds from the algorithmically sorted “home” version to “latest,” where tweets are shown in reverse chronological order. In other words, the way Twitter was meant to be read all along, despite a recent attempt to force the home timeline on users.

Musk’s rationale is that the algorithm can subconsciously manipulate you. This is, to Musk’s credit, a pretty reasonable viewpoint backed up by research. A math equation that only shows you what it thinks you want to see will, over time, make it harder to accept other sources of information.  

Former Twitter founder Jack Dorsey seemingly took a little offense to the idea, saying the algorithmic feed was simply designed for people who don’t obsessively check Twitter. In a later reply downthread to another user, Dorsey admitted the algorithm can have “unintended consequences,” but maintained it wasn’t designed to manipulate users.

Again, in fairness to Musk, he didn’t say the algorithm was intended to manipulate, just that it happens. This is all an excuse for me to tell you that, on the most basic level, Musk is right about this: You need to switch your Twitter feed from “home” to “latest” pronto. Don’t let the machine feed tweets to you. 

The only reasonable way to sort internet content is by chronological order. Time doesn’t manipulate, at least not as easily as these algorithms do.

Subscribe The Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

Mashable

The best smart glasses of CES 2026

I’ve already covered a lot of trends emerging from CES 2026, but one of the most notable has been smart glasses, in all their various

Mashable

This $28 scanner app lasts for life

TL;DR: A one-time $27.99 gives you permanent access to iScanner — an all-in-one mobile scanner, PDF editor, and file manager backed by powerful AI, available

Do You Want To Stay Connected?

drop a line and keep in touch